Opinion

Bellamy v. Union County Board of Education

Court
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Filed
May 21, 2024
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 24.9%

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

CHARLOTTE DIVISION

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:23-CV-00898-RJC-SCR

GERALD BELLAMY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

) ORDER

UNION COUNTY BOARD OF )

EDUCATION, )

)

Defendant. )

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant’s “Motion to Dismiss” (Doc. No. 7)

filed April 29, 2024. Plaintiff filed his “Amended Complaint” (Doc. No. 9) on May 20, 2024.

Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs amendments to pleadings. Rule

15(a)(1) grants a party the right to “amend its pleading once as a matter of course,” if done within

21 days after serving the pleading, Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(A), or “if the pleading is one to which

a responsive pleading is required,” a party may amend once as a matter of course, provided that it

does so within “21 days after service of a responsive pleading or 21 days after service of a motion

under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever is earlier.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). The Rule further

provides that leave to amend shall be freely given “when justice so requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P.

15(a)(2).

Plaintiff filed his Amended Complaint within 21 days following receipt of Defendant’s

Motion to Dismiss. Accordingly, the amendment is as a matter of course. Fed. R. Civ. P.

15(a)(1)(B).

It is well-settled that an amended pleading supersedes the original pleading, and that

motions directed at superseded pleadings are to be denied as moot. Hall v. Int’] Union, United

Auto., Aerospace & Agric. Implement Workers of Am., No. 3:10-CV-418-RJC-DSC, 2011 WL

4014315, at *1 (W.D.N.C. June 21, 2011); Young v. City of Mount Ranier, 238 F.3d 567, 572-73

(4th Cir. 2001).

The Court makes no determination as to the merits of any of Plaintiffs claims and all

objections and defenses raised by Defendant in its initial Motion are preserved.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Defendant’s “Motion to Dismiss” (Doc. No. 7) is administratively DENIED as moot

without prejudice.

2. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to counsel for the parties and to the

Honorable Robert J. Conrad, Jr..

Signed: May 21, 2024

SO ORDERED.

Susan C. Rodriguez

United States Magistrate Judge UES

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.