Opinion

Greene v. Lassiter

Court
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Filed
Apr 4, 2024
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

ASHEVILLE DIVISION

1:19-cv-00224-MR

COREY DELON GREENE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) ORDER

)

)

KENNETH LASSITER, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

___________________________ )

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Fourth Circuit’s decision in

Rogers v. Rich, No. 22-7167.

Pro se Plaintiff Corey Delon Greene (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner of the

State of North Carolina, currently incarcerated at Alexander Correctional

Institution (“Alexander”) in Taylorsville, North Carolina. On July 18, 2019,

Plaintiff filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants

Kenneth Lassiter, Tim Moose, Todd Ishee, Sarah Cobb, Betty Brown, and

Chris Rich claiming his rights under the First Amendment and the Religious

Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-

1, were violated while he was incarcerated at Avery/Mitchell Correctional

Institution in Spruce Pine, North Carolina, because Defendants refused to

recognize the Nation of Gods and Earth (“NGE”) as a religion and classified

NGE as a Security Risk Group (SRG) for over 20 years. [Doc. 1]. Plaintiff

seeks an injunction allowing him to practice NGE “as any other religion” and

monetary damages for liberties lost due to his SRG status. [Id. at 17-18].

On January 5, 2022, the Court granted summary judgment for

Defendants based primarily on Plaintiff’s sworn allegation that NGE is a

culture, not a religion. [See Doc. 83 at 3-4, 14-16]. Shortly thereafter, the

Court denied Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration [Doc. 89] and Plaintiff

appealed [Doc. 90]. The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit vacated the

Court’s entry of summary judgment and remanded for further proceedings.

Greene v. Lassiter, No. 22-6273, 2023 WL 8618519 (4th Cir. Dec. 13, 2023).

The Fourth Circuit held that this Court erred in concluding that Plaintiff’s

sworn allegation “that NGE ‘is a God centered culture’ that must not be

‘misconstrued as religion’” was a “relief-foreclosing judicial admission” under

RLUIPA and the First Amendment. Id. at *1. The Fourth Circuit concluded,

therefore, that “there may be at least an open factual question about whether

NGE qualifies as a religion for RLUIPA and First Amendment purposes.” Id.

Defendants moved to stay this matter pending the decision of the

Fourth Circuit in Rogers v. Rich, No. 22-7167. Rogers involves a prisoner

plaintiff claiming RLUIPA and First and Fourteenth Amendment violations

based on the alleged denial of his right to practice Nation of Islam and his

categorization as SRG based on his adherence to the NGE. Betty Brown

and Chris Rich were the only remaining Defendants in Rogers. Id., Doc. 9

at 2. Defendants argued that a stay was necessary because the instant case

“presents the same situation, with the additional factors that the defendants

in this case overlap with the defendants” in Rogers. [Doc. 101 at 4]. Finally,

Defendants argued that Plaintiff will not be prejudiced by the stay because

“Defendants now recognize NGE as a religion.” [Id. at 5 (emphasis in

original)]. The Court granted Defendants’ motion to stay this matter pending

the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Rogers. [Doc. 103].

The Fourth Circuit has now issued its decision in Rogers, finding that

Plaintiff forfeited appellate review of the district court’s order because he

failed to meaningfully challenge its conclusion that the prison policies at issue

were the least restrictive means of furthering a compelling government

interest. Rogers v. Rich, No. 22-7167, 2024 WL 1230147, at *1 (4th Cir.

2024). In light of the decision in Rogers, the Court will lift the stay in this

matter. The Court will allow the parties to supplement the summary

judgment record in this matter with additional arguments and materials,

including sworn testimony.

ORDER

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the stay in this matter is hereby

LIFTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendants shall FILE any

supplements to their summary judgment materials within 30 days of this

Order, and the Petitioner may file a response thereto within 30 days after the

Defendants’ service thereof.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed: April 4, 2024

Martifi Reidinger ee

Chief United States District Judge “AES

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.