Opinion

Hancock v. Brown

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jun 25, 2008
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6662

PRESTON HANCOCK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WENDY BROWN, Case Manager Court Legal,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District

Judge. (3:08-cv-00014-HEH)

Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: June 25, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Preston Hancock, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Preston Hancock appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his complaint for failing to return a

consent to the collection of fees form. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Hancock v. Brown, No.

3:08-cv-00014-HEH (E.D. Va. Apr. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.