Opinion

Brown v. United States

Court
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Filed
May 18, 2020
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 24.7%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

CHARLOTTE DIVISION

3:16-cv-343-RJC

(3:04-cr-273-RJC-DCK-1)

DENNIS WILLIAM BROWN, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) ORDER

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Respondent. )

___________________________________ )

THIS MATTER is before the Court on a Response, (Doc. No. 6), filed by counsel for

Petitioner that is construed as a Motion to Stay.

Petitioner filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate through counsel raising a claim

pursuant to Johnson v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015). (Doc. No. 1). This action was

stayed for several years pending the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals’ consideration of United

States v. Ali, No. 15-4433. (Doc. No. 4). The Court recently ordered the parties to file a

Response indicating why this matter should not proceed based on the United States Supreme

Court’s decision in United States v. Davis, No. 18-431. (Doc. No. 5). Petitioner has now filed a

Response asking that the stay pursuant to Ali remain in place and that the Court also stay the

case pursuant to United States v. Taylor, No. 19-7616, in which a certificate of appealability was

granted on the issues of whether attempted Hobbs Act robbery categorically qualifies as a

predicate crime of violence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), and whether a § 924(c) conviction is

subject to vacatur when the indictment charges multiple predicates, one of which is invalid.

Counsel for the Government consents to this request. (Doc. No. 6 at 3). The Court finds that a

1

stay pursuant to Ali and Taylor is in the interest of justice and judicial economy and will be

granted.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s Response, (Doc. No. 6), is construed as a Motion to Stay and is

GRANTED.

2. This case is held in abeyance pending the Fourth Circuit’s consideration of Ali,

No. 15-4433 and Taylor, No. 19-7616. The Government shall have 60 days

following the Fourth Circuit’s issuance of its mandates in Ali and Taylor file an

answer, motion, or other response to the § 2255 Motion to Vacate.

Signed: May 18, 2020

Robert J. Conrad, Jr. ed,

United States District Judge “ee

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.