Opinion

I.M. v. Granville County Board of Education

Court
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Filed
Feb 17, 2023
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 24.6%

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

WESTERN DIVISION

NO. 5:22-CV-7-FL

I.M. and T.R. by and through their )

respective Guardians Ad Litem, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) ORDER

)

GRANVILLE COUNTY BOARD OF )

EDUCATION, )

)

Defendant. )

This matter is before the court upon defendant’s motion for partial dismissal of plaintiff’s

amended complaint, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). (DE 29).

Plaintiffs have not responded in opposition, and defendant has set forth multiple grounds for

dismissal of plaintiffs’ Fourteenth Amendment due process claim and that part of plaintiff’s claim

for injunctive relief based thereon. Plaintiff’s claim for damages under the Fourteenth Amendment

properly is dismissed because there is no implied cause of action against a local government entity

outside of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Cale v. City of Covington, Va., 586 F.2d 311, 318 (4th Cir.

1978). That part of plaintiff’s claim for injunctive relief based on a Fourteenth Amendment

violation accordingly also is dismissed.

In sum, defendant’s motion (DE 29) is GRANTED, and plaintiffs’ Fourteenth Amendment

due process claim and that part of plaintiff’s claim for injunctive relief based thereon are

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED, this the 16th day of February, 2023.

( ee W. FLANAGWN

United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.