Opinion

Brown v. Saul

Court
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Filed
Jul 7, 2021
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 24.4%

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI

GREENVILLE DIVISION

BARBARA ANN BROWN PLAINTIFF

V. NO. 4:20-CV-102-DMB-RP

ANDREW SAUL,

Commissioner of Social Security DEFENDANT

ORDER

On June 22, 2021, United States Magistrate Judge Roy Percy issued a Report and

Recommendation (“R&R”) in this appeal from the unfavorable decision of the Commissioner of

Social Security regarding Barbara Ann Brown’s application for disability insurance benefits. Doc.

#24. The R&R recommends that the decision be affirmed. Id. at 1. No objections to the R&R

were filed.

“With respect to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections

were raised, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no plain error on the face of the record.”

Gauthier v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 644 F. Supp. 2d 824, 828 (E.D. Tex. 2009) (citing Douglass v.

United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428–29 (5th Cir. 1996)). The Court has reviewed the

R&R and finds no plain error on the face of the record. Accordingly, the R&R [24] is ADOPTED

as the order of the Court. The Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED.

SO ORDERED, this 7th day of July, 2021.

/s/Debra M. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.