Opinion

Clark v. Sutton

  • 251 F. App'x 165
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Oct 16, 2007
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Michael, Shedd, Hamilton
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6222

ORLANDO RAPHEAL CLARK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ERNEST R. SUTTON; CURTIS E. BROWN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior

District Judge. (5:05-ct-00724-H)

Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 16, 2007

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Orlando Rapheal Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Orlando Rapheal Clark appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clark v.

Sutton, No. 5:05-ct-00724-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 2007). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.