The opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
DISTRICT OF MAINE
LYNN MERRILL, et al.,
Plaintiffs
v. NO. 1:20-cv-00248-JAW
CITY OF AUGUSTA, et al.,
Defendants.
CONSENT ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
This matter comes before the Court upon the Parties’ Joint Stipulation of
Dismissal with Prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (see ECF 75-2),
conditioned on the Court’s retention of jurisdiction to resolve any motions brought
to enforce or modify the terms of the parties’ fully executed Settlement Agreement
and Release (hereafter “Settlement Agreement,” attached hereto and see ECF 75-1).
See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 114 S. Ct. 1673,
128 L. Ed. 2d 391, 29 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1 (1994).
The parties have agreed that the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice
is neither immediately effective nor self-executing, and it will take effect only upon
the entry of an order by the Court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement
Agreement. The Parties and their counsel have agreed as set forth below as evidence
by signatures of counsel also appearing below. Good cause has been shown for the
entry of this Order.
IT IS THEREFORE on this 24th day of June, 2021, Ordered as follows:
1. The Court incorporates the terms of the Settlement Agreement herein
and makes it an Order of the Court.
2. The Court retains ancillary jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement
Agreement and resolve any disputes regarding compliance that may occur through
November 30, 2024. See Settlement Agreement ¶¶ 3(c), (d)
3. The Court finds that the scope of the court's continuing jurisdiction is
limited by reasonable time limits for the parties to invoke the court's review of issues
arising from the Settlement Agreement.
4. Any dispute regarding compliance with the Settlement Agreement and
this Order shall be brought to and resolved by this Court. The Court has discretion
to award any legal or equitable relief it deems appropriate in the event of non-
compliance with the Settlement Agreement.
5. Subject to the foregoing, and except as expressly set forth above, all
claims and defenses in the action shall be and hereby are released with prejudice.
6. Except as otherwise agreed to by the Parties, each party to bear its own
fees and costs incurred to date in this action.
2
Dated: June 23, 2021 Dated: June 23, 2021
/s/ Kristin L. Aiello /s/ Stephen E. F. Langsdorf
Kristin L. Aiello Stephen E. F. Langsdorf
/s/ Peter M. Rice /s/ Laura Rideout
Peter M. Rice Laura Rideout
DISABILITY RIGHTS MAINE PRETI FLAHERTY
160 Capitol Street, Suite 4 45 Memorial Circle
Augusta, Maine 04330 Augusta, ME 04330
(207) 626-2774 (207) 623-5300
kaiello@drme.org slangsdorf@preti.com
pmrice@drme.org LRideout@preti.com
Counsel for City of Augusta
/s/ Eve Hill /s/ Joshua K. Saucier
Eve Hill Joshua K. Saucier
BROWN GOLDSTEIN & LEVY Assistant City Solicitor
120 E. Baltimore Street, Suite 2500 City of Bangor
Baltimore, MD 21202 73 Harlow Street
(410) 962-1030 ext. 1311 Bangor, Maine 04401
EHill@BROWNGOLD.COM (207) 992-4276
Josh.Saucier@bangormaine.gov
Counsel for Plaintiffs Counsel for City of Bangor
/s/Danielle P. West
Danielle P. West
Corporation Counsel
City of Portland
389 Congress Street, Room 211
Portland, Maine
(207) 874.8480
Counsel for City of Portland
3
/s/ William A. Lee III
William A. Lee III
O’Donnell Lee, P.A.
112 Silver Street
Waterville Me 04901
Phone: 207-872-0112
walee@watervillelaw.com
Counsel for the Town of Winslow
SO ORDERED.
Dated this 24th day of June, 2021
/s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr.
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
4