Opinion

MERRILL v. DUNLAP

Court
District Court, D. Maine
Filed
Jun 24, 2021
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 23.3%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

DISTRICT OF MAINE

LYNN MERRILL, et al.,

Plaintiffs

v. NO. 1:20-cv-00248-JAW

SHENNA BELLOWS, et al.,

Defendants.

CONSENT ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

This matter comes before the Court upon the Parties’ Joint Stipulation of

Dismissal with Prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (see ECF 74-2),

conditioned on the Court’s retention of jurisdiction to resolve any motions brought

to enforce or modify the terms of the parties’ fully executed Settlement Agreement

and Release (hereafter “Settlement Agreement,” attached hereto). See Kokkonen v.

Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 114 S. Ct. 1673, 128 L. Ed. 2d

391, 29 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1 (1994).

The parties have agreed that the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice

is neither immediately effective nor self-executing, and it will take effect only upon

the entry of an order by the Court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement

Agreement. The Parties and their counsel have agreed as set forth below as evidence

by signatures of counsel also appearing below. Good cause has been shown for the

entry of this Order.

IT IS THEREFORE on this 24th day of June, 2021, Ordered as follows:

1. The Court incorporates the terms of the Settlement Agreement herein

and makes it an Order of the Court.

2. The Court retains ancillary jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement

Agreement and resolve any disputes regarding compliance that may occur through

November 30, 2024. See Settlement Agreement ¶¶ 3(c), (d)

3. The Court finds that the scope of the court's continuing jurisdiction is

limited by reasonable time limits for the parties to invoke the court's review of issues

arising from the Settlement Agreement.

4. Any dispute regarding compliance with the Settlement Agreement and

this Order shall be brought to and resolved by this Court. The Court has discretion

to award any legal or equitable relief it deems appropriate in the event of non-

compliance with the Settlement Agreement.

5. Subject to the foregoing, and except as expressly set forth above, all

claims and defenses in the action shall be and hereby are released with prejudice.

6. Except as otherwise agreed to by the Parties, each party to bear its own

fees and costs incurred to date in this action.

2

For Plaintiffs: For Defendants:

Dated: June 23, 2021 Dated: June 23, 2021

/s/ Kristin L. Aiello /s/ Valerie A. Wright

Kristin L. Aiello Valerie A. Wright

DISABILITY RIGHTS MAINE Assistant Attorney General

160 Capitol Street, Suite 4 6 State House Station

Augusta, Maine 04330 Augusta, ME 04333-0006

(207) 626-2774 (207) 626-8568

kaiello@drme.org Valerie.A.Wright@maine.gov

Counsel for State Defendants

/s/ Peter M. Rice

Peter M. Rice

DISABILITY RIGHTS MAINE

160 Capitol Street, Suite 4

Augusta, Maine 04330

(207) 626-2774

pmrice@drme.org

/s/ Eve Hill

Eve Hill

BROWN GOLDSTEIN & LEVY

120 E. Baltimore Street, Suite 2500

Baltimore, MD 21202

(410) 962-1030 ext. 1311

EHill@BROWNGOLD.COM

Counsel for Plaintiffs

SO ORDERED.

Dated this 24th day of June, 2021

/s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr.

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.