Opinion

Lin v. Gonzales

  • 133 F. App'x 882
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jun 10, 2005
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Luttig, Michael, Duncan
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1959

BIN LIN,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A79-318-713)

Submitted: April 27, 2005 Decided: June 10, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Karen Jaffe, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler,

Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant

Director, Benjamin D. Brown, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Bin Lin, a native and citizen of China, petitions for

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming

the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against

Torture.

Lin contends that he established eligibility for asylum.

As the IJ concluded that the asylum application was untimely, we

find that consideration of Lin’s asylum claim is barred. See 8

U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3) (2000). Lin next asserts that he was denied

due process at the asylum hearing because his testimony was rushed

due to the interpreter’s need to leave early for a medical

appointment. We reject this claim because Lin fails to show that

he was prejudiced by the alleged violation. See Rusu v. INS, 296

F.3d 316, 320 (4th Cir. 2002).

We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.