The opinion
UNITED STATES District courr | LE D
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS □□ □□
EASTERN DIVISION MAY 25 2023 □
THOMAS G. BRUTON
Samuel Sledge-Plaintiff, CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
Vv CASE NO 1: 2022 CV 03935
The Village of Melrose Park-Defendant,
Motion for Judgment as a matter of law (c » \e
Jurisdiction Article 111 § 11 USC Extend to cases and controversy's under USC.
1. Law; motion to invoke the agency’s original jurisdiction on its application of
ordinance and state law. That conflicts with federal law under Article 1 § 8 cl 3.
2. The final order must apply a rehearing for contested cases under APA 5 ILCS 100/1-
30, 5 ILCS 100/1 50 and hearing are allowed under 235 ILCS 5 /7-9. the failure to apply
the following statutes affected equal protection of law under the USC.
3. The mayors final order conflicts with due process of law the arbitrary and capricious
(not done by statute) order doesn't allow equal protection of law.
Cases and controversy's
4. The requirement for the due process clause is the provision of adequate notice and
some kind of hearing before an individual is deprived of property or interest Bradley v
village of Univ. Park 929, F 3d. 875, 882 (7™ cir. 2019).
Motion to dismiss under 12 (b) 6
5. A district court must limit itself to the facts stated in the complaint or documents to
the complaint as exhibits Kramer v Time Warner Inc, 937 F.2d. 767, 773 (2d Cir. 1991)
See plaintiff exhibits 7.
6. A claim has factual plausibility when the plaintiff factual contents that allows the
court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is libel for his misconduct
alleged, Ashcroft v Iqbal 556, U.S. 662, 678, 129 S Ct. 1937, 173 L. E. 2d 868 (2009).
7. The court must accept all factual allegations as true, but give no effect to legal
conclusions, Skinner v Switzer 562, U.S. 521, 530, (2011) All facts in the pleadings
are true and the court to apply the law to the facts to the motion on the pleadings.
The commissioner must accept plaintiff certificate of authority to transact business
8. The fact is that the village doesn't regulate foreign cooperation's and that the court must apply the act
of congress that regulates international commerce for foreign cooperation's. In its findings.
9. Judgment on the pleadings on the basics that no answer has been filed to admit or deny the factual
pleadings enclosed, that there are no material issues of fact to be resolved, and that the plaintiff is
entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
WHEREFORE, plaintiff respectfully request that this honorable court deny defendants motion to
dismiss that her motion must accept all factual allegations as true for failure to deny.
708 415 5055 led
Samuel Sledge ?
907 N. Lawler / fp) on
Chicago, Illinois 60651
Defendant was notified by e mail 5/25/2023
: OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE
WHITE Seorciary of Sie nee]
6248-679-2
MAY 28, 2021 □
SABRIAN SLEDGE
4842 BUTTERFIELD
HILLSIDE, I, e0i62
RE LOGIC RxyaMTNaTron ASSISTANCE LTp_
DEAR SIR OR MADAM: ~
CORPORATION TO TRANSAC? BUSINESS ty oe STRORITY FOR THE ABOVE NAMED
IN THIS CONNECTION HAVE BEEN RECEIVED AND CREDITED.
SINCERELY,
SECRETARY OF STATE
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS SERVICES □
CORPORATION DIVISION
TELEPHONE (217) 782-6951
LT pqusl
, A. ff, UW An | f7
aver )! TS 29use, 91138
he given To Th ACTS rause
Sf Of □□
□□
MAYOR " Melrose Park SS
Man bo
Mary Ann Paolantonio “TRUSTEES.
CLERK Anthony N. Abruzzo Jaime Anguiano Arturo J. Moia
Louis “Sonny” Nicotera Anthony J. Prignano Mary Ramirez-Tacon
June 15,2021
Mid REGULAR & CERTIFIED Mar
Samuel Sledge
907 N. Lawler
Chicago, Hlnois 60651
Ke: Request for Re-Hearing □
Dear Mr. Sledge:
The Village of Melrose Park is in receipt of a document dated Fone 9, 202] made
fo the attention of the local liquor control commissioner for the Village of Melrose Park
requesting a re-hearing of the May 24, 2621 “hearing * Kindly be advised that the
meeting that occurred before the Village of Melrose Park Board of Trustees on May 24,
2021 was a Tegularly scheduled Village Board meeting which included consideration of
your application for a business license, which was denied. Your application for a Melrose
Park liquor license for a private social club was separately denied by the local liquor
control commissioner for the Village of Melrose Park. Your purported request for a “re-
hearing” js denied. A hearing on YOur initial application for a liquor license was not
required under the Village’s Code of Ordinances or the ilinois Liquor Control Act.
: Alar 3 loafer
Ronald M. Serpico, 2” .
Local Liquor Control Commissioner
OEP
EX h )by7 /
here are ND ACTS Wy AThendéaTion Fo give Kyy
—*F) _ eo Ao
C17 706, (hr Cr Ore Unc OW STITY Tiana 2 MNS1s7HUI TO