Opinion

Brown v. Brooks

  • 96 F. App'x 929
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
May 21, 2004
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Wilkinson, King, Shedd
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6128

CHARLES BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOSEPH M. BROOKS; UNITED STATES PAROLE

COMMISSION,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-03-346-2)

Submitted: May 12, 2004 Decided: May 21, 2004

Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Lynn Van Valkenburg,

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Charles Brown, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Brown v. Brooks, No. CA-03-346-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 26, 2003). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.