Opinion

Khoury v. The Miami-Dade County School Board

Court
District Court, S.D. Florida
Filed
Mar 4, 2022
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 20.1%

The opinion

United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Susan Khoury, Plaintiff )

) Civil Action No. 16-20680-Civ-Scola

Miami-Dade County School Board

and Gregory Williams, Defendants. )

Order

Before the Court is Plaintiff Susan Khoury’s motion to reinstate Count

VII of the complaint against the Defendant Miami-Dade County School Board

(ECF No. 232). The Court previously disposed of that count on summary

judgment. (See ECF No. 188). Ms. Khoury appealed the Court’s summary

judgment order to the Eleventh Circuit, which returned a mandate affirming

the Court’s grant of summary judgment to the School Board and remanding

certain claims against Defendant Gregory Williams. (See ECF No. 225.)

The School Board’s liability in this case was predicated on Officer

Williams having acted pursuant to “a policy statement, ordinance, regulation or

decision officially adopted and promulgated by [the School Board’s] officers.”

Monell v. New York City Dep’t Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 690 (1978). On

summary judgment, the Court found “no facts in the record demonstrat[ing]”

the existence of “a policy, custom, or practice of improperly invoking the Baker

Act at the time of th[e] incident|[,]” and entered judgment in favor of the School

Board. (ECF No. 188, 11.) The Eleventh Circuit agreed. (ECF No. 225, 28-29.)

In her motion, filed roughly a month before trial, Ms. Khoury argues that

the Court should reinstate Count VII against the School Board because the

Eleventh Circuit was “silent ... regarding Ms. Khoury’s state-law false arrest

claim against the School Board|.|” (ECF No. 232, 2.) That is wrong. By

upholding the Court’s ruling on Ms. Khoury’s Monell claim, the Eleventh

Circuit necessarily foreclosed Ms. Khoury from attempting to reassert claims

against the School Board. The Court “may not alter, amend, or examine the

[Eleventh Circuit’s] mandate, or give any further relief or review . . .” in respect

thereof. See Friedman v. Mkt. St. Mortg. Corp., 520 F.3d 1289, 1294 (11th Cir.

2008) (quoting Piambino v. Bailey, 757 F.2d 1112, 1120 (11th Cir. 1985)).

Accordingly, Ms. Khoury’s motion (ECF No. 232) is denied.

Done and ordered, at Miami, Florida, on March 3, 2022.

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.