Opinion

Alexander v. School Board of Palm Beach County, Florida

Court
District Court, S.D. Florida
Filed
Jan 10, 2022
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 20.1%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 20-80336-CIV-CANNON/Reinhart

DR. SHERNETTE ALEXANDER,

Plaintiff,

v.

SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM

BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation issued by

Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart recommending that Defendant’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and

Non-Taxable Costs (“Motion for Fees and Non-Taxable Costs”) be denied [ECF No. 115]. On

September 12, 2021, the Court referred Defendant’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs to

Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart for a Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 107 (referring

ECF No. 103)]. On December 13, 2021, Judge Reinhart issued the instant Report (“R&R”),

recommending that the Motion for Fees and Non-Taxable Costs be denied [ECF No. 115]. The

R&R states that the parties shall file any objections within fourteen days of the date of service of

the R&R [ECF No. 115 pp. 7–8]. No objections have been filed.

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the R&R and the record in this case and is

otherwise fully advised in the premises. See Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1291 (11th Cir.

2009) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Upon review, the Court finds the R&R to be correct to the

extent it determines, for purposes of assessing fees under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e–5k, that Plaintiff’s

CASE NO. 20-80336-CIV-CANNON/Reinhart

claims under Title VII were not entirely frivolous or groundless. The Court therefore agrees,

consistent with the conclusion in the R&R, that Defendant’s Bill of Taxable Costs should be

DENIED, but the Court REJECTS the R&R to the extent it draws other conclusions or

makes any other suggestions about the nature of Plaintiff's evidence or Defendant’s actions.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The R&R [ECF No. 115] is ACCEPTED to the limited extent noted in this

Order.

2. Defendant’s Bill of Taxable Costs [ECF Nos. 103] is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida this 10th day of January

2022.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ce: counsel of record

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.