The opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 JABORIE BROWN, Case No.: 1:21-cv-01297-JLT (HC)
12 Petitioner, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
13 v. THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
14 WARDEN OF USP ATWATER,
15 Respondent.
16
17 The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity
18 jurisdiction, be brought only in “(1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all
19 defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located, (2) a judicial district in which
20 a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part
21 of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) if there is no district in which an action
22 may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any defendant
23 is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).
24 In this case, the petitioner is challenging a conviction from Miami - Dade County, which is
25 in the Southern District of Florida. Therefore, the petition should have been filed in the United
26 States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. In the interest of justice, a federal court
27 may transfer a case filed in the wrong district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a);
28 Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974).
1 Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that this matter is transferred to the United States District
2 Court for the Southern District of Florida.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5 Dated: August 30, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28