Opinion

Brown v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

Court
District Court, S.D. Florida
Filed
May 11, 2021
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 20.1%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT PIERCE DIVISION

CASE NO. 19-14210-CIV-CANNON/Reid

FRANKLIN BROWN,

Petitioner,

v.

SEC’Y, FLA. DEP’T OF CORR.,

Respondent.

______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [ECF No. 1], filed by Petitioner Franklin Brown on June 17, 2019 (“Petition”).

The Court referred the Petition to Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid for a Report and

Recommendation (“Report”) on all dispositive matters [ECF No. 2]. On March 10, 2021,

Magistrate Judge Reid issued a Report recommending that the Petition be denied, the Motion to

Stay the Instant Proceeding [ECF No. 13] be denied, and that no certificate of appealability issue

[ECF No. 15]. The Report advised the Petitioner to file any objections within fourteen days of the

date of service of a copy of the Report [ECF No. 15, p. 17]. To date, Petitioner has not filed any

objections or sought additional time within which to do so.

A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). When a party makes

timely objections to a Report and Recommendation, the district court “make[s] a de novo

determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations

to which objection is made.” Id. When no party objects, the district court need not conduct a de

CASE NO. 19-14210-CIV-CANNON

novo review. Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also United States v.

Slay, 714 F.2d 1093, 1095 (11th Cir. 1983); Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th

Cir. 2006).

The Court has carefully reviewed the Petition [ECF No. 1], the State’s Response [ECF No.

10; ECF No. 10-1], Petitioner’s Motion to Stay Proceedings [ECF No. 13], the State’s Response

in Opposition [ECF No. 14], and the Report [ECF No. 15]. Applying the clearly erroneous

standard, the Court ADOPTS the Report and ACCEPTS Judge Reid’s recommendation that the

Petition and Motion to Stay be DENIED for the reasons set forth therein.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report [ECF No. 15] is ADOPTED;

2. The Petition [ECF No. 1] is DENIED;

3. The Motion to Stay [ECF No. 13] is DENIED;

4. A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT ISSUE;

5. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT; and

6. The Clerk shall CLOSE this case.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Pierce, Florida this 10th day of May 2021.

AILEE i CANNON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ce: counsel of record

Franklin Brown, #419235

Okeechobee Correctional Institution

Inmate Mail/Parcels

3420 N.E. 168th Street

Okeechobee, Florida 34972

PROSE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.