Opinion

Greacen v. Town of Redington Beach

Court
District Court, M.D. Florida
Filed
Feb 27, 2023
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 19.9%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TAMPA DIVISION

SHAWN BUENDING, ROBERT DOHMEN,

THOMAS K. BROWN, HARRY S.

FIELDS, WENDY FIELDS,

SHAWN MOORE, and DAGMAR MOORE,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 8:19-cv-1473-VMC-MRM

TOWN OF REDINGTON BEACH,

Defendant.

______________________________/

PAMELA GREACEN and

ARTHUR L. BUSER, JR.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 8:20-cv-2568-VMC-MRM

TOWN OF REDINGTON BEACH,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on consideration of

Plaintiffs Shawn Buending, Robert Dohmen, Thomas K. Brown,

Harry S. Fields, Wendy Fields, Shawn Moore, Dagmar Moore,

Pamela Greacen, and Arthur L. Buser, Jr.’s Motion to Stay

Case (Doc. # 150 (19-cv-1473); Doc. # 77 (20-cv-2568)), filed

on February 9, 2023. Defendant Town of Redington Beach

responded on February 13, 2023. (Doc. # 151 (19-cv-1473);

Doc. # 78 (20-cv-2568)). For the reasons that follow, the

Motion is granted.

Discussion

A district court has “broad discretion to stay

proceedings as an incident to its power to control its own

docket.” Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706 (1997)(citing

Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936)). Deciding

whether to stay a case “calls for the exercise of judgment,

which must weigh competing interests and maintain an even

balance.” Landis, 299 U.S. at 254-55.

This Court considers “several factors when evaluating a

request for a stay, including prejudice to the non-moving

party, whether the requested stay would simplify and clarify

the issues, and whether the potential stay would reduce the

burden of litigation on the parties and on the court.”

Mackiewicz v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, No. 6:15-cv-465-GKS-

GJK, 2015 WL 11983233, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 10, 2015)(citing

Freedom Sci., Inc. v. Enhanced Vision Sys., No. 8:11-cv-1194-

CEH-AEP, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11410, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Jan.

21, 2012)).

The Plaintiffs move to stay this case pending rulings

from two Florida appellate courts in related cases

challenging the state’s customary use doctrine. (Doc. # 150

at 6). In the matter of Dirty Duck 16004 LLC et al v. Town of

Redington Beach, Case No. 2D23-251, currently pending before

Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal, owners of

beachfront property have sued Redington Beach claiming the

same customary use ordinance at issue in the instant case is

invalid. (Id. at 2). In the matter of Northshore Holdings,

LLC et al v. Walton County, Florida, Case No. 1D22-0895,

currently pending before Florida’s First District Court of

Appeal, owners of beachfront property in Walton County

challenge the existence of customary use doctrine in Florida,

arguing among other things that it was never adopted as a

background principle of Florida law. (Id. at 3).

The Plaintiffs argue that a stay is appropriate because

rulings in the state appellate cases could invalidate

Redington Beach’s customary use ordinance challenged here.

(Id. at 9). Both cases, according to the Plaintiffs, are

likely to resolve unsettled issues of state law relevant to

this case. (Id. at 9-11).

Plaintiffs further argue that Redington Beach will

suffer no prejudice from the stay because Redington Beach’s

ordinance will remain in effect during the stay. (Id. at 12).

Regarding the Court’s interests, Plaintiffs insist that a

stay will promote judicial economy by likely simplifying the

issues to be tried in this case and avoiding the potential

for inconsistent rulings on state law. (Id.). Redington Beach

opposes a stay, chiefly because it believes the state

appellate cases might not resolve all the issues in this case.

(Doc. # 151 at 3-8).

The Court concludes that a stay pending resolution of

the two state appellate cases would promote judicial economy.

A district court may “stay a case pending the resolution of

related proceedings in another forum.” Ortega Trujillo v.

Conover & Co. Commc’ns, 221 F.3d 1262, 1264 (11th Cir. 2000).

The subject matter of the state appellate cases is directly

related to the cases in front of this Court, and both have

the potential to resolve relevant, unsettled issues of

Florida law.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:

(1) Plaintiffs Shawn Buending, Robert Dohmen, Thomas K.

Brown, Harry S. Fields, Wendy Fields, Shawn Moore,

Dagmar Moore, Pamela Greacen, and Arthur L. Buser, Jr.’s

Motion to Stay Case (Doc. # 150 (19-cv-1473); Doc. # 77

(20-cv-2568)) is GRANTED.

(2) The case is stayed until further order of the Court.

(3) The Clerk is directed to stay and administratively close

this case.

(4) The Plaintiffs are directed to immediately notify the

Court upon the resolution of the Dirty Duck 16004 LLC et

al v. Town of Redington Beach case in the Second District

Court of Appeal, including the entry of any substantive

order or opinion.

(5) The Plaintiffs are directed to immediately notify the

Court upon the resolution of the Northshore Holdings,

LLC et al v. Walton County, Florida case in the First

District Court of Appeal, including the entry of any

substantive order or opinion.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, this

27th day of February, 2023.

VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ’COVINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.