The opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7573
FREDERICK BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JAMES R. METTS, Sheriff; CAPTAIN WILLIAMS;
MAJOR HARRIS; EMSA CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CARE
SERVICES; ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 02-7775
FREDERICK BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JAMES R. METTS, Sheriff; CAPTAIN WILLIAMS;
MAJOR HARRIS; EMSA CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CARE
SERVICES; ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (CA-99-1040-3-10BC)
Submitted: March 24, 2003 Decided: April 9, 2003
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick Brown, Appellant Pro Se. James Miller Davis, Jr.,
DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Frederick Brown appeals the district court’s orders accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying reconsideration
of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Brown v. Metts, No. CA-99-1040-3-10BC
(D.S.C. Oct. 4 & 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2