Opinion

Snow v. Align Technology, Inc.

Court
District Court, N.D. California
Filed
Aug 26, 2022
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 18.8%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MISTY SNOW, et al., Case No. 21-cv-03269-VC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO JOIN

v. A NECESSARY PARTY

ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 124

Defendant.

Align’s motion to join SmileDirectClub is denied. The plaintiffs are clear that they are

not seeking injunctive relief on their Section 1 claim. While the complaint could have been

drafted more carefully in this respect, the fairest reading is that the Section | claim seeks

damages only. And absent the possibility of an injunction on that claim, Align’s argument that

the various agreements make SmileDirectClub a necessary party to this case would swallow the

general rule that it is not necessary to sue every alleged antitrust conspirator. See Ward v. Apple,

Inc., 791 F.3d 1041, 1052 (9th Cir. 2015). SmileDirectClub remains free to move to intervene.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 26, 2022 Ko“.

VINCE CHHABRIA

United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.