Opinion

Calhoun v. Google LLC

Court
District Court, N.D. California
Filed
Aug 12, 2022
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 18.8%

The opinion

1

2

3

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

7 PATRICK CALHOUN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-05146-YGR (SVK)

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING

9 v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS FOR

LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL

10 GOOGLE LLC,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 786, 793, 803, 809, 812

11 Defendant.

12 Before the Court are administrative motions to file under seal materials associated with

13 discovery disputes in this case. Dkt. 786, 793, 803, 809, 812; see also Dkt. 820, 825.

14 Courts recognize a “general right to inspect and copy public records and documents,

15 including judicial records and documents.” Kamakana v. City & Cnty. Of Honolulu, 447 F.3d

16 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Communs., Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7

17 (1978)). A request to seal court records therefore starts with a “strong presumption in favor of

18 access.” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178 (quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d

19 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)). The standard for overcoming the presumption of public access to

court records depends on the purpose for which the records are filed with the court. A party

20

seeking to seal court records relating to motions that are “more than tangentially related to the

21

underlying cause of action” must demonstrate “compelling reasons” that support secrecy. Ctr. For

22

Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., 809 F.3d 1092, 1099 (9th Cir. 2016). For records attached to

23

motions that re “not related, or only tangentially related, to the merits of the case,” the lower

24

“good cause” standard of Rule 26(c) applies. Id.; see also Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179. A party

25

moving to seal court records must also comply with the procedures established by Civil Local

26

Rule 79-5.

27

1 Here, the “good cause” standard applies because the information the parties seek to seal

2 was submitted to the Court in connection with discovery-related motions, rather than a motion that

3 concerns the merits of the case. The Court may reach different conclusions regarding sealing

4 these documents under different standards or in a different context. Having considered the

5 motions to seal, supporting declarations, and the pleadings on file, and good cause appearing, the

6 Court ORDERS as follows:

7 1. Dkt. 786

8

Document Sought to Court’s Ruling on Reason(s) for Court’s Ruling

9

be Sealed Motion to Seal

10 Google LLC’s GRANTED as to the The information requested to be sealed

Administrative Motion portions at: contains Google’s confidential and

11 Updating the Court on its proprietary information regarding sensitive

Preservation Efforts and Pages 1:16-25, 2:2-18, features of Google’s internal systems and

12 Seeking Relief from the 3:2-6, 3:9-19, 4:4-13, operations, including internal projects, data

July 30 Deadline

4:15, 4:19-27, 5:4-13, signals, and logs, and their proprietary

13 Imposed by the July 15,

5:17-18, 5:27 functionalities, that Google maintains as

2022 Preservation Order

14 (Dkt 766) confidential in the ordinary course of its

business and is not generally known to the

15 public or Google’s competitors. Such

confidential and proprietary information

16 reveals Google’s internal strategies, system

designs, and business practices for operating

17

and maintaining many of its services. Public

18 disclosure of such confidential and

proprietary information could affect Google’s

19 competitive standing as competitors may alter

their systems and practices relating to

20 competing products. It may also place Google

at an increased risk of cybersecurity threats,

21

as third parties may seek to use the

22 information to compromise Google’s internal

practices relating to competing products.

23 Proposed Order Granting GRANTED as to the The information requested to be sealed

Google’s Administrative portions at: contains Google’s confidential and

24 Motion Seeking Relief proprietary information regarding sensitive

25 f Dro eam d lineth Ie m poJ su edly b y t3 h0 e Page 2:11-12 f oe pa et ru ar te is o no s,f G ino co lug dle in’s g in it ne tr en ra nl a l sys lote gm s,s ta hn ad t

July 15, 2022

26 Google maintains as confidential in the

Preservation Order

ordinary course of its business and is not

(DKT. 766)

27 generally known to the public or Google’s

proprietary information reveals Google’s

1

internal strategies, system designs, and

2 business practices for operating and

maintaining many of its services. Public

3 disclosure of such confidential and

proprietary information could affect Google’s

4 competitive standing as competitors may alter

their systems and practices relating to

5

competing products. It may also place Google

6 at an increased risk of cybersecurity threats,

as third parties may seek to use the

7 information to compromise Google’s internal

practices relating to competing products.

8 Declaration of Benjamin GRANTED as to the The information requested to be sealed

Kornacki portions at: contains Google’s confidential and

9

proprietary information regarding sensitive

10 Pages 1:23, 1:27-28, features of Google’s internal systems and

2:1-6, 2:8, 2:10-24, operations, including internal projects, data

11 3:6-12, 3:15, 3:17 signals, and logs, and their proprietary

functionalities, that Google maintains as

12 confidential in the ordinary course of its

business and is not generally known to the

13

public or Google’s competitors. Such

14 confidential and proprietary information

reveals Google’s internal strategies, system

15 designs, and business practices for operating

and maintaining many of its services. Public

16

disclosure of such confidential and

17 proprietary information could affect Google’s

competitive standing as competitors may alter

18 their systems and practices relating to

competing products. It may also place Google

19 at an increased risk of cybersecurity threats,

as third parties may seek to use the

20

information to compromise Google’s internal

21 practices relating to competing products.

22 2. Dkt. 793

23

Document Sought to Court’s Ruling on Reason(s) for Court’s Ruling

24 be Sealed Motion to Seal

Google LLC’s GRANTED as to the The information requested to be sealed

25 Supplement to portions at: contains Google’s confidential and

Administrative Motion proprietary information regarding sensitive

26 Updating the Court on its Pages 1:21, 1:23, features of Google’s internal systems and

27 Preservation Efforts and 1:28, 2:11-12, 3:2- operations, including various types of

Seeking Relief from the

24,4:2-3. Google’s internal logs and data signals, that

2022 Preservation Order ordinary course of its business and is not

1 (Dkt 766) generally known to the public or Google’s

2 competitors. Such confidential and

proprietary information reveals Google’s

3 internal strategies, system designs, and

business practices for operating and

4 maintaining many of its services. Public

disclosure of such confidential and

5

proprietary information could affect Google’s

6 competitive standing as competitors may alter

their systems and practices relating to

7 competing products. It may also place Google

at an increased risk of cybersecurity threats,

8 as third parties may seek to use the

information to compromise Google’s internal

9

practices relating to competing products.

10

3. Dkt. 803; see also Dkt. 820

11

12 Document Sought to Court’s Ruling on Reason(s) for Court’s Ruling

be Sealed Motion to Seal

13 Plaintiffs’ Response to GRANTED as to the The information requested to be sealed

Google’s portions at: contains Google’s confidential and

14

Administrative proprietary information regarding sensitive

15 Motion for Relief Pages 2:19, 2:22, features of Google’s internal systems and

(Dkt. No. 787) from 2:26, 3:9, 3:22-24, operations, including various types of

16 the Court’s Modified 4:9-10, 4:15, 4:20-21, Google’s internal projects, data signals, and

Preservation Plan 4:23, 4:26-27, 5:5-6, logs, and their proprietary functionalities, that

17 (Dkt. No. 766) 5:9-10, 5:12-15, 5:23, Google maintains as confidential in the

6:3, 6:5, 6:7, 6:10-11, ordinary course of its business and is not

18

6:13, 6:20-28 generally known to the public or Google’s

19 competitors. Such confidential and

proprietary information reveals Google’s

20 internal strategies, system designs, and

business practices for operating and

21 maintaining many of its services. Public

disclosure of such confidential and

22

proprietary information could affect Google’s

23 competitive standing as competitors may alter

their systems and practices relating to

24 competing products. It may also place Google

at an increased risk of cybersecurity threats,

25 as third parties may seek to use the

information to compromise Google’s internal

26

practices relating to competing products.

27

4. Dkt. 809; see also Dkt. 825

1

2 Document Sought to Court’s Ruling on Reason(s) for Court’s Ruling

be Sealed Motion to Seal

3

Plaintiffs’ GRANTED as to the The information requested to be sealed

4 Administrative portions at: contains Google’s confidential and

Motion to Clarify the proprietary information regarding sensitive

5 Court’s Modified Pages 3:8, 3:12, 3:17- features of Google’s internal systems and

Preservation Plan 26, 4:4-6 operations, including various types of

6

Dated July 15, 2022 Google’s internal projects, data signals and

7 (Dkt. No. 766) their proprietary functionalities, that Google

Regarding Definition maintains as confidential in the ordinary

8 of “Express” Sync course of its business and is not generally

State Fields known to the public or Google’s competitors.

9 Such confidential and proprietary information

reveals Google’s internal strategies, system

10

designs, and business practices for and

11 maintaining many of its services. Public

disclosure of such confidential and

12 proprietary information could affect Google’s

competitive standing as competitors may alter

13 their systems and practices relating to

competing products. It may also place Google

14

at an increased risk of cybersecurity threats,

15 as third parties may seek to use the

information to compromise Google’s internal

16 practices relating to competing products.

[Proposed] Order GRANTED as to the The information requested to be sealed

17 Clarifying the Court’s portions at: contains Google’s confidential and

Modified Preservation proprietary information regarding sensitive

18

Plan Dated July 15, Page 1:22-28 features of Google’s internal systems and

19 2022 [Dkt. 766] operations, including various types of

Google’s internal projects, data signals and

20 their proprietary functionalities, that Google

maintains as confidential in the ordinary

21 course of its business and is not generally

known to the public or Google’s competitors.

22

Such confidential and proprietary information

23 reveals Google’s internal strategies, system

designs, and business practices for operating

24 and maintaining many of its services. Public

disclosure of such confidential and

25

proprietary information could affect Google’s

competitive standing as competitors may alter

26

their systems and practices relating to

27 competing products. It may also place Google

at an increased risk of cybersecurity threats,

information to compromise Google’s internal

1

practices relating to competing products.

2

5. Dkt. 812

3

Document Sought Court’s Ruling on Reason(s) for Court’s Ruling

4 to be Sealed Motion to Seal

Google’s Opposition GRANTED as to the The information requested to be sealed

5 portions at: contains Google’s confidential and

proprietary information regarding sensitive

6

Page 2 Lines 21, 26, 27 features of Google’s internal systems and

7 Page 3 Lines 11, 14 operations, including logs, and their

proprietary functionalities, that Google

8 maintains as confidential in the ordinary

course of its business and is not generally

9

known to the public or Google’s competitors.

Such confidential and proprietary

10

information reveals Google’s internal

11 strategies, system designs, and business

practices for operating and maintaining many

12 of its services. Public disclosure of such

confidential and proprietary information

13

could affect Google’s competitive standing as

14 competitors may alter their systems and

practices relating to competing products. It

15 may also place Google at an increased risk of

cybersecurity threats, as third parties may

16 seek to use the information to compromise

Google’s internal practices relating to

17

competing products.

18 Exhibit A GRANTED as to the The information requested to be sealed

portions at: contains Google’s confidential and

19 proprietary information regarding sensitive

Pages 6, 7 features of Google’s internal systems and

20 operations, including logs, and their

proprietary functionalities, that Google

21

maintains as confidential in the ordinary

22 course of its business and is not generally

known to the public or Google’s competitors.

23 Such confidential and proprietary

information reveals Google’s internal

24 strategies, system designs, and business

practices for operating and maintaining many

25

of its services. Public disclosure of such

26 confidential and proprietary information

could affect Google’s competitive standing as

27 competitors may alter their systems and

I cybersecurity threats, as third parties may

seek to use the information to compromise

2 Google’s internal practices relating to

competing products.

3 SO ORDERED.

4

Dated: August 12, 2022

5

° Sessoen yerKl

7 SUSAN VAN KEULEN

United States Magistrate Judge

8

9

10

11

12

13

15

16

= 17

Z 18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.