Opinion

Clark v. Brown

Court
District Court, N.D. California
Filed
May 9, 2022
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 18.8%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 ALPHONSO RAMON CLARK, Case No. 21-09230 BLF (PR)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

13 v . AMENDED COMPLAINT

14 DR. MOLLY BROWN, et al.,

15 Defendants.

(Docket No. 5)

16

17

18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner currently housed at Napa State Hospital, filed a pro se civil

19 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 1. On April 5, 2022, the Court

20 dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 3. Plaintiff was directed to file an

21 amended complaint within twenty-eight days from the date the order was filed, i.e., no

22 later than May 3, 2022. Id.

23 On April 29, 2022, Plaintiff filed a letter requesting an extension of time to file an

24 amended complaint, which the court construes as a motion for an extension of time. Dkt.

25 No. 5. The timely filed request is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint

26 using the court’s form complaint to attempt to correct the deficiencies in the original

27 complaint no later than June 1, 2022.

1 || order, i.e., Case No. C 21-09230 BLF (PR), and the words “AMENDED COMPLAINT”

2 || on the first page. Plaintiff must answer all the questions on the form in order for the action

3 || to proceed. Plaintiff is reminded that the amended complaint supersedes the original, and

4 || Plaintiff may not make references to the original complaint. Claims not included in the

5 || amended complaint are no longer claims and defendants not named in an amended

6 || complaint are no longer defendants. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th

7 {| Cir.1992).

8 Failure to respond in accordance with this order by filing an amended

9 || complaint in the time provided will result in the dismissal of this action without

10 || prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff.

11 IT ISSO ORDERED.

«12 || Dated: _ May 9, 2022 tp)

BETH LABSON FREEMAN

13 United States District Judge

15

16

Oo

Z 18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Order Granting Mot. for EOT to File Am. Compl.

27 PRO-SE\BLF\CR.21\09230Clark_eot-ac

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.