Opinion

Poorsina v. Tseng

Court
District Court, N.D. California
Filed
Jul 8, 2021
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 18.8%

noting Rule 55’s “two-step process of ‘Entering a Default’ and 20 ‘Entering a Default Judgment’”

How later courts described this case

  • noting Rule 55’s “two-step process of ‘Entering a Default’ and 20 ‘Entering a Default Judgment’”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

1

2

3

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

7 ALI POORSINA, Case No. 20-cv-09122-AGT

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

9 v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT

10 TAN TSENG, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 19

Defendants.

11

12

13 Before the Court is pro se plaintiff Ali Poorsina’s motion for default judgment against all

14 defendants. Dkt. 19. The motion is denied as procedurally improper.

15 Obtaining a default judgment in federal court involves a two-step process: (1) seeking a

16 clerk’s entry of default under Rule 55(a), and (2) filing a motion for entry of default judgment

17 under Rule 55(b). Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), (b); Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471 (9th Cir. 1986)

18 (recognizing “two-step process required by Rule 55”); Symantec Corp. v. Glob. Impact, Inc., 559

19 F.3d 922, 923 (9th Cir. 2009) (noting Rule 55’s “two-step process of ‘Entering a Default’ and

20 ‘Entering a Default Judgment’”). When the clerk has not entered default against a defendant, a

21 motion for default judgement against that defendant is improper. Bradford v. Voong, 2017 WL

22 6558586, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2017) (denying motion for default judgment because the clerk

23 had not entered default and collecting cases doing same).

24 In the pending motion, Poorsina claims that “the Clerk made an entry of default pursuant

25 to Rule 55(a) [] on June 1, 2021.” Dkt. 19 at 1. The docket, however, reveals that Poorsina has

26 not requested or obtained entry of default by the Clerk of Court. Accordingly, his motion for

27 default judgment is not properly before the undersigned and is denied without prejudice.

] Poorsina is encouraged to visit the Court’s website, where he can obtain information and

2 || resources about appearing pro se. See U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal., Representing Yourself,

3 https://cand.uscourts.gov/pro-se-litigants/. Poorsina may also schedule an appointment with the

4 || Legal Help Center by emailing fedpro@sfbar.org, or by calling (415) 782-8982.

5 IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 || Dated: July 8, 2021

7

ALEX G. TSE

8 United States Magistrate Judge

9

10

1]

12

2B

15

16

17

Z 18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.