The opinion
1
2
3
4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7 CHASOM BROWN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-03664-LHK (SVK)
8 Plaintiffs,
ORDER ON ADMINISTRATIVE
9 v. MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
10 GOOGLE LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 176
11 Defendant.
12 Now before the Court is Google’s Administrative Motions to File Documents Under Seal
13 (Dkt. 176) seeking to seal portions of the Parties’ May 26, 2021 Joint Discovery Submission (Dkt.
14 177).
15 Courts recognize a “general right to inspect and copy public records and documents,
16 including judicial records and documents.” Kamakana v. City & Cnty. Of Honolulu, 447 F.3d
17 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Communs., Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7
18 (1978)). A request to seal court records therefore starts with a “strong presumption in favor of
19 access.” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178 (quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d
1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)). The standard for overcoming the presumption of public access to
20
court records depends on the purpose for which the records are filed with the court. A party
21
seeking to seal court records relating to motions that are “more than tangentially related to the
22
underlying cause of action” must demonstrate “compelling reasons” that support secrecy. Ctr. For
23
Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., 809 F.3d 1092, 1099 (9th Cir. 2016). For records attached to
24
motions that re “not related, or only tangentially related, to the merits of the case,” the lower
25
“good cause” standard of Rule 26(c) applies. Id.; see also Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179. A party
26
moving to seal court records must also comply with the procedures established by Civil Local
27
1 Here, the “good cause” standard applies because the information the parties seek to seal
2 || was submitted to the Court in connection with a discovery-related motion, rather than a motion
3 || that concerns the merits of the case. The Court may reach different conclusions regarding sealing
4 || these documents under different standards or in a different context. Having considered the
5 motions to seal, supporting declarations, and the pleadings on file, and good cause appearing, the
6 || Court ORDERS as follows:
4
8 en Court’s Ruling
ought to be on Motion to Reason(s) for Court’s Ruling
9 ealed Seal
Joint Submissi GRANTED as to Narrowly tailored to protect
10 Submission redacted portions confidential technical information
ll at pages 6, 10 regarding features of Google’s
operations, including the various
types of Google’s internal
identifiers/cookies and their
& 13 proprietary functions, that Google
5 maintains as confidential in the
14 ordinary course of its business and
Ss is not generally known to the public
15 or Google’s competitors.
A 16 SO ORDERED.
.
g 17 Dated: June 8, 2021
Z 18
19 Suse val
SUSAN VAN KEULEN
20 United States Magistrate Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28