Opinion

Intuit Inc. v. Visa Inc.

Court
District Court, N.D. California
Filed
Mar 5, 2021
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 18.7%

The opinion

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: PAYMENT CARD INTERCHANGE FEE

AND MERCHANT DISCOUNT ANTITRUST

LITIGATION MDL No. 1720

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —33)

On October 19, 2005, the Panel transferred 14 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for

the Eastern District of New York for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1407. See 398 F.Supp.2d 1356 (J.P.M.L. 2005). Since that time, 56 additional action(s)

have been transferred to the Eastern District of New York. With the consent of that court, all such

actions have been assigned to the Honorable Margo K. Brodie.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are

common to the actions previously transferred to the Eastern District of New York and assigned to

Judge Brodie.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the

Eastern District of New York for the reasons stated in the order of October 19, 2005, and, with the

consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Margo K. Brodie.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States

District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall

be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the

Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is

pending at this time, the

stay is lifted.

FOR THE PANEL:

2 Sb.

John W. Nichols

Clerk of the Panel

A TRUE COPY

pare March'5, 21

DOUGLAS C. PALMER

CLERK 7

BY Cingpd Tri nL.

AUGUST MARZILIA Oe

bed

IN RE: PAYMENT CARD INTERCHANGE FEE

AND MERCHANT DISCOUNT ANTITRUST

LITIGATION MDL No. 1720

SCHEDULE CTO-33 — TAG—-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN

CAN 3 21-01234 Intuit Inc. et al v. Visa Inc. et al

EDNY Docket Number 1:21-cv-01175(MKB)(VMS)

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.