Opinion

Quair v. Brown

Court
District Court, N.D. California
Filed
Apr 17, 2020
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 18.6%

The opinion

1

2

3

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

7 DAVID SABINO QUAIR, Case No. 20-cv-00716-JD

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

9

10 GILBERT H. BROWN,

Defendant.

11

12

13 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He

14 has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

15 DISCUSSION

16 STANDARD OF REVIEW

17 Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek

18 redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C.

19 § 1915A(a). In its review, the Court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims

20 which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek

21 monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. at 1915A(b)(1),(2). Pro se

22 pleadings must be liberally construed. Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th

23 Cir. 1990).

24 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) requires only “a short and plain statement of the

25 claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Although a complaint “does not need detailed

26 factual allegations, . . . a plaintiff’s obligation to provide the ‘grounds’ of his ‘entitle[ment] to

27 relief’ requires more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a

1 the speculative level.” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (citations

2 || omitted). A complaint must proffer “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its

3 face.” Id. at 570. The United States Supreme Court has explained the “plausible on its face”

4 || standard of Twombly: “While legal conclusions can provide the framework of a complaint, they

5 must be supported by factual allegations. When there are well-pleaded factual allegations, a court

6 || should assume their veracity and then determine whether they plausibly give rise to an entitlement

7 to relief.” Ashcroft v. Igbal, 556 U.S. 662, 679 (2009).

8 To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege that: (1) a right secured by

9 the Constitution or laws of the United States was violated, and (2) the alleged deprivation was

10 || committed by a person acting under the color of state law. West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988).

11 LEGAL CLAIMS

Plaintiff alleges that he was transferred from prison to Santa Clara County Jail for

E 13 warrants, but his court documents had the wrong booking number, birthdate and social security

S 14 || number. For relief he seeks defendants to be prosecuted and to no longer be falsely incarcerated.

2 15 These allegations fail to state claim. To the extent plaintiff seeks to challenge his incarceration he

16 must pursue the habeas petitions he has already filed. The Court notes that plaintiff is already

"7 challenging the conditions of his confinement in several civil rights cases in this Court. Because

no amount of amendment would cure the deficiencies in this complaint, this action is

0 DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim. The Clerk is requested to close this case.

21 IT IS SO ORDERED.

22 || Dated: April 17, 2020

23

24

25 JAMES ATO

United Si#tes District Judge

26

27

28

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3

DAVID SABINO QUAIR,

4 Case No. 20-cv-00716-JD

Plaintiff,

5

6 Vv. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

5 GILBERT H. BROWN,

Defendant.

8

9

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.

10

District Court, Northern District of California.

11

12

That on April 23, 2020, | WILL SERVE a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by

13

= placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by

14

depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(es) into an inter-office delivery

15

receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

16

17 || David Sabino Quair ID: BG0478

CSP-CMC East Fac B -3234

4 18 || P.O. Box 8101

San Luis Obispo, CA 93409-8101

19

20

21 Dated: April 17, 2020

22

Susan Y. Soong

23 Clerk, United States District Court

24

25

M62 . Llar

26 LI . CLARK, Deputy Clerk to the

7 Honorable JAMES DONATO

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.