Opinion

Godoy v. Brown

Court
District Court, N.D. California
Filed
Jan 13, 2020
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 18.6%

The opinion

1

2

3

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

7 MAURICE GODOY, Case No. 18-cv-06650-HSG

8 Plaintiff, ORDER SUA SPONTE GRANTING

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

9 v. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

10 EDMUND GERRY BROWN, et al.,

11 Defendants.

12

13 Plaintiff, an inmate at Chuckawalla Valley State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action

14 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will sua sponte grant

15 plaintiff an extension of time to February 14, 2020 to file a second amended complaint.

16 DISCUSSION

17 On November 26, 2019, the Court dismissed plaintiff’s amended complaint with leave to

18 amend, noting that the amended complaint suffered from the same deficiencies as the initial

19 complaint. Dkt. No. 28. Plaintiff was ordered to file a second amended complaint by December

20 24, 2019, that addressed the identified deficiencies, or this action would be dismissed. Dkt. No.

21 28 at 6. The deadline has passed and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint. Plaintiff

22 did, however, file a notice of appeal (“NOA”) with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, appealing

23 the Court’s November 26, 2019 Order.1 Dkt. No. 30. The NOA does not stay the Court’s

24 deadlines. If plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, he must file a complaint that states

25 cognizable claims. The Court will sua sponte grant plaintiff an extension of time to February 14,

26 2020 to file a second amended complaint that addresses the deficiencies identified in the Court’s

27

1 November 26, 2019 Order. Failure to file a proper second amended complaint in the time

2 || provided will result in the dismissal of this action without further notice to plaintiff. If using

3 the court form complaint, plaintiff must answer all the questions on the form in order for the

4 || action to proceed. Plaintiff is reminded that an amended complaint completely replaces the

5 previous complaints, see Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992), and that he may

6 || not incorporate material from the prior complaints by reference. Plaintiff also may not change the

7 nature of this suit by alleging new, unrelated claims in the second amended complaint. The Clerk

8 shall include two copies of a blank complaint form with a copy of this order to plaintiff.

9 CONCLUSION

10 For the reasons set forth above, the Court sua sponte grants plaintiff an extension of time

11 to February 14, 2020 to file a second amended complaint. Failure to file a proper second

12 || amended complaint in the time provided will result in the dismissal of this action without

5 13 || further notice to plaintiff. The Clerk shall include two copies of a blank complaint form with a

14 || copy of this order to plaintiff.

3 15 IT IS SO ORDERED.

a 16 || Dated: 1/13/2020

Abppurd 5 Mei).

8 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.