Opinion

(PC) Brown v. Kennison

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Feb 7, 2024
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 18.5%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 MARK ANTHONY BROWN, 1:24-cv-00168-EPG (PC)

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE

13 v. NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14 D. KENNISON, et al.

15 Defendant.

16

17 Plaintiff Mark Anthony Brown, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights

18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on February 6,

19 2024. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2). Plaintiff is suing several correctional officers at Pelican Bay State

Prison, located in Crescent City, California, which is part of Del Norte County.

20

The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity

21

jurisdiction, be brought only in “(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all

22

defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located, (2) a judicial district in which

23

a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part

24

of the property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) if there is no district in which an

25

action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any

26

defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.” 28 U.S.C.

27

§ 1391(b).

28

1 In this case, none of the Defendants reside in this district. The claim arose in Del Norte

2 | County, which is in the Northern District of California. Therefore, Plaintiff's claim should have

3 | been filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

4 In the interest of justice, a federal court may transfer a complaint filed in the wrong

5 district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932

6 (D.C. Cir. 1974).

7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United

8 States District Court for the Northern District of California.

? | IT IS SO ORDERED.

10

1, | Dated: _February 7, 2024 [see ey

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.