Opinion

Cook v. Board of Trustees of CSU

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Jul 6, 2023
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 18.4%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 BOOKER COOK, Case No.: 2:23-cv-00843 DJC CKD

12 Plaintiff(s),

13 v. SCHEDULING ORDER

14 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CALIFORNIA

15 STATE UNIVERSITY, ET AL.,

16 Defendant(s).

17

18 I. SERVICE OF PROCESS

19 The named defendants have been served as required by Federal Rule of Civil

20 Procedure 5. No further service is permitted without leave of the Court, good cause

21 having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b).

22 II. JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES / AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS

23 No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without

24 leave of the Court, good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson

25 v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 27 604 (9th Cir. 1992).

26 III. DISCOVERY PROCEDURES

27 Discovery matters that do not implicate the schedule of the case or that do not

28 relate to sealing or redaction of documents related to dispositive motions are referred

1 to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge, who will hear all discovery disputes

2 subject to his or her procedures. All discovery documents must include the words

3 “DISCOVERY MATTER” in the caption to ensure proper routing. Do not direct delivery

4 of courtesy copies of these documents to the District Judge. Counsel are directed to

5 review and comply with the case management procedures of the assigned Magistrate

6 Judge when setting applicable discovery matters for hearing. All motions to compel

7 discovery must be noticed on the assigned Magistrate Judge’s calendar in

8 accordance with the local rules of this Court and the Magistrate Judge’s own

9 procedures.

10 The written ruling of the assigned Magistrate Judge shall be final, subject to

11 modification by the District Judge only where it has been shown that the Magistrate

12 Judge’s order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A).

13 Pursuant to Local Rule 303, any party may file and serve a “Request for

14 Reconsideration by the District Judge of Magistrate Judge’s Ruling.” See L.R. 303(c).

15 The requesting party must file and serve any such request within fourteen (14) days of

16 service of a written ruling. L.R. 303(b). The request must specify which portions of the

17 ruling are clearly erroneous or contrary to law and the basis for that contention with

18 supporting points and authorities. L.R. 303(c).

19 In addition, the assigned Magistrate Judge reviews proposed discovery phase

20 protective orders sought by the parties pursuant to Local Rule 141.1. However,

21 requests to seal or redact in connection with dispositive motions or trial are decided

22 by Judge Calabretta and any such requests must comply with Judge Calabretta’s

23 Standing Order and Local Rules 140 and 141.

24 IV. DISCOVERY DEADLINES

25 A. Rule 26(a) Initial Disclosures

26 If not already completed, all parties appearing shall make initial disclosures

27 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 26(a)(1) no later than 8/3/2023. Any

28 parties served or joined after the issuance of this scheduling order shall “make the

1 initial disclosures within 30 days after being served or joined,” as provided by Rule

2 26(a)(1)(D).

3 B. Fact Discovery

4 All fact discovery shall be completed1 no later than 6/14/2024.

5 C. Expert Discovery

6 The parties shall disclose initial experts and produce reports in accordance with

7 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) by no later than 8/9/2024. With regard to

8 expert testimony intended solely for rebuttal, those experts shall be disclosed and

9 reports produced in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) on or

10 before 9/6/2024. All expert discovery shall be completed no later than 10/4/2024.

11 Disclosures of expert witnesses, if any, must be made pursuant to Federal Rule

12 of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(A), (B) and (C), and shall include all information required

13 thereunder. Each expert witness must be fully prepared to be examined on all

14 subjects and opinions included in the disclosures. Failure to comply with these

15 requirements may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including the

16 preclusion of the expert’s testimony, or of other evidence offered through the expert.

17 D. Joint Mid-Discovery Statement

18 By 2/23/2024, all parties shall file with the Court a brief Joint Mid-Discovery

19 Statement summarizing the current status of discovery proceedings. In this statement,

20 parties should state whether parties are actively engaged in discovery and identify any

21 issues preventing discovery from proceeding in a timely manner. The filing of this

22 statement shall not relieve the parties or counsel of their obligations to meet and

23 confer, comply the deadlines set by the court, and timely notice all appropriate

24 discovery motions.

25

1 As used herein, the word “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all

26 depositions have been taken and any disputes relevant to discovery shall have been resolved by

appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been obeyed.

27 The parties are advised that motions to compel must be filed in advance of the discovery completion

deadlines so that the Court may grant effective relief within the allotted discovery time. A party’s failure

28 to have a discovery dispute heard sufficiently in advance of the discovery cutoff may result in denial of

1 V. MOTIONS

2 All motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders, or

3 other emergency applications, shall be filed on or before 12/13/2024 and shall be

4 noticed for hearing before Judge Calabretta on 2/6/2025 at 1:30 p.m. Counsel are

5 directed to refer to the local rules and Judge Calabretta’s Standing Order regarding

6 the requirements for noticing and opposing such motions on the Court’s regularly

7 scheduled law and motion calendar.

8 All moving and opposition briefs or legal memoranda in civil cases shall not

9 exceed twenty-five pages without prior leave of court. Reply briefs filed by moving

10 parties shall not exceed fifteen pages. The Court will grant an application to extend

11 these page limitations only after good cause shown. Pages that exceed the page

12 limitations without leave of court will not be considered. Finally, no supplemental

13 briefs or sur-replies shall be filed and will not be considered without prior leave of

14 court.

15 Prior to filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for partial summary

16 judgment (summary adjudication), the parties are ordered to meet and confer, in

17 person or by telephone, to discuss the issues to be raised in the motion as required by

18 Judge Calabretta’s Standing Order. Failure to do so may result in denial of the

19 motion. In addition to complying with the requirements of Local Rule 260, the

20 parties must prepare a Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts, which identifies all

21 relevant facts subject to agreement by all parties. The moving party is responsible

22 for filing the joint statement concurrently with the motion. In the notice of motion, the

23 moving party shall certify that the parties have met and conferred as ordered above or

24 provide a statement of good cause for the failure to do so. In addition to the above,

25 when filing any motion, parties should reference and ensure compliance with Judge

26 Calabretta’s Standing Order.

27 ///

28 ///

1 VI. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

2 No Settlement Conference is currently scheduled. If the parties wish to have a

3 settlement conference, one will be scheduled at the final pretrial conference or at an

4 earlier time upon request of the parties.

5 VII. FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

6 The final pretrial conference is set for 4/24/2025 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom

7 10 before District Court Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. Hearings may be conducted by

8 Zoom upon the joint request of all parties.

9 The parties are directed to file a joint pretrial statement that complies with the

10 requirements of Local Rule 281 and Judge Calabretta’s Standing Order in Civil Cases

11 not less than seven (7) days prior to the Pretrial Conference. Counsel shall e-mail a

12 copy of the joint pretrial statement in Word format to Judge Calabretta's chambers at

13 djcorders@caed.uscourts.gov immediately thereafter.

14 The parties’ attention is directed to Local Rules 281 and 282. This Court will

15 insist upon strict compliance with these rules. At the pretrial conference, the Court will

16 set deadlines to file trial documents, including motions in limine, trial briefs, and

17 proposed jury voir dire, instructions, and verdict forms (where applicable).

18 VIII. JURY TRIAL

19 A jury trial is set for 6/16/2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 10 before District

20 Court Judge Daniel J. Calabretta.

21 IX. RELATED MATTERS PENDING

22 The parties have not alerted the court to any related litigation.

23 X. OBJECTIONS AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE SCHEDULING ORDER

24 This case schedule will become final without further order of the Court

25 unless objections are filed within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this order.

26 The schedule, once final, shall not be modified except by leave of the Court upon

27 showing of good cause. Counsel shall contact Judge Calabretta’s courtroom deputy,

28 Gabriel Michel, via e-mail at gmichel@caed.uscourts.gov, prior to filing a stipulation

1 and proposed order to continue the dates set forth herein.

2 The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of

3 Civil Procedure, no stipulations extending scheduling requirements or modifying

4 applicable rules are effective until and unless the Court approves them. Agreement of

5 the parties by stipulation alone does not constitute good cause. Counsel are

6 cautioned that requests or stipulations to continue dispositive motion deadlines or

7 trial dates must establish good cause exists and are not granted lightly.

8 Any request or stipulation to modify this scheduling order must set forth:

9 (1) the existing due date or hearing date as well as the discovery cutoff date,

10 the last date for hearing motions, the final pretrial conference date, and

11 the trial date;

12 (2) whether there have been prior requests for extensions, and whether

13 these were granted or denied by the Court; and

14 (3) specific, concrete reasons supporting good cause for granting of the

15 extension. For example, if the reason for the requested extension is that

16 it “will promote settlement,” the requesting party or parties must indicate

17 the status of ongoing negotiations, e.g., that a mediator has been

18 selected; written proposals have been exchanged; a draft settlement

19 agreement is being reviewed by counsel; etc.

20

21 IT IS SO ORDERED.

22

23 Dated: July 5, 2023 /s/ Daniel J. Calabretta

THE HONORABLE DANIEL J. CALABRETTA

24

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.