The opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 KENYON DERRAL BROWN, Case No. 1:21-cv-01061-DAD-HBK (HC)
12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S
MOTION FOR REVIEW OF PETITION TO
13 v. THE LIMITED EXTENT SET FORTH
HEREIN
14 NORTHERN KERN STATE PRISON,
WARDEN, (Doc. No. 33)
15
Respondent.
16
17
18
19
20 Petitioner Kenyon Derral Brown, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has pending a
21 petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1). Before the Court is
22 Petitioner’s “Motion for Judgment.” (Doc. No. 33).
23 The Court liberally construes the motion as a request for the Court to review the petition
24 and issue a ruling. (Doc. No. 33). The Court has the discretion to manage its own docket. Ferdik
25 v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1261 (9th Cir. 1992). And while the Court endeavors to handle all
26 matters as expeditiously as possible, this Court has “long labored under one of the heaviest
27 caseloads in the nation.” See Standing Order in Light of Ongoing Judicial Emergency in Eastern
28 District of California.
1 Accordingly, Petitioner is advised that the Court will issue findings and recommendations
2 | regarding his petition in due course. Therefore, Petitioner’s motion for review is granted to the
3 | extent that the Court will consider and review this matter as quickly as its caseload permits.
4 Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
5 Petitioner’s motion for review of the petition (Doc. No. 33) is GRANTED to the limited
6 | extent that the Court will review this case as expeditiously as possible in light of its current
7 | caseload.
8
” | Dated: _ June 14, 2022 law Th. Doareh Hack
10 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28