Opinion

(PC) Brown v. Patterson

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Jun 10, 2022
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 18.1%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 FREDERICK BROWN, Case No. 2:21-cv-01271-JDP (PC)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

13 v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM

14 MARY PATTERSON, et al.,

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

15 Defendants. DAYS

16

17 On April 27, 2022, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint, notified him that it failed to

18 state a claim, and gave him thirty days to file a second amended complaint. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff

19 has not filed an amended complaint.1

20 To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires

21 litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute

22 or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres.

23 Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439,

24 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). Involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty, but a district court has a duty to

25 administer justice expeditiously and to avoid needless burden on the parties. See Pagtalunan v.

26

1 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the April 27, 2022 order was

27 returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court

apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents

28 at the record address of a party is fully effective.

1 | Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002); Fed. R. Civ. P. 1.

2 Plaintiff will be given a chance to explain why the court should not dismiss the case for

3 | his failure to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff's failure to respond to this order will constitute

4 | a failure to comply with a court order and will result in a recommendation that this action be

5 | dismissed. Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to show cause within twenty-one days why this case

6 | should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to state a claim. Should plaintiff wish

7 | to continue with this lawsuit, he shall file, within twenty-one days, an amended complaint.

8

9 IT IS SO ORDERED.

10 ( 1 Ow —

Dated: _ June 10, 2022

11 JEREMY D. PETERSON

Db UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.