The opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 | EUGENE C. BROWN, Case No. 1:19-cv-00352-DAD-EPG (PC)
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR
13 v. DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
14 | C. CHOTHIA, et al.,
(ECF No. 97)
15 Defendants.
16
7 On February 9, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this entire action with
8 rejudice. (ECF No. 97.) In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with
rejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th
19
ir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case.
20
However, the Court retains jurisdiction over the litigation to enforce the terms of the
21
parties’ settlement agreement.
22
23
94 [T IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: _February 11, 2022 [Je hey
26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27