Opinion

(PC)Ellis v. Brown

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Dec 7, 2021
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.7%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 BENJAMIN F. ELLIS, No. 2:21-cv-1635-EFB P

12 Plaintiff,

13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 R. BROWN, et al.,

15 Defendants.

16

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed an in forma pauperis application in which he states that he has

19 no cash. ECF No. 5 at 2. However, his attached inmate trust account statement reflects that he

20 has a balance of $5,417.99. Id.

21 The court may authorize the commencement of an action “without prepayment of fees or

22 security therefor” by an individual who submits an application evidencing an inability to pay such

23 fees or give security therefor. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiff has made an inadequate showing of

24 indigency in the application before the court. It will therefore be recommended that the

25 application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that plaintiff be required to pay the

26 $402.00 before this action can proceed.

27 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall randomly assign a

28 United States District Judge to this action.

1 Further, it is RECOMMENDED that:

2 1. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 5, be DENIED.

3 2. Plaintiff be given thirty days from any order adopting this recommendation to pay the

4 || filing fee or face dismissal of the case.

5 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

6 || assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days

7 || after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

8 || objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

9 || “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

10 || within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

11 || Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Yist, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

12 || Dated: December 7, 2021.

13 tid, PDEA

14 EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.