The opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 DONTA LADEAL KYLE, No. 2:21-cv-0479 KJM KJN P
12 Plaintiff,
13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
14 CALIFORNIA VICTIM
COMPENSATION BOARD, ET AL.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18 On June 7, 2021, the district court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend,
19 granting plaintiff sixty days in which to file an amended complaint. Sixty days from that date
20 have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the
21 court’s order.
22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
23 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
27 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
28 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that
1 | failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District
2 | Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
3 || Dated: August 27, 2021
' Foci) Aharon
5 KENDALL J. NE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6 || Kyleo479.f1a
7
8
9
10
1]
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28