Opinion

(PC) Kyle v. California Victim Compensation Board

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Jun 7, 2021
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.6%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 | Donta Ladeal Kyle, No. 2:21-cv-00479-KJM-KJIN

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER

13 v.

14 California Victim Compensation Board, et al.,

1S Defendants.

16

17 Donta Ladeal a Kyle, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

18 | seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

19 | Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20 On April 9, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were

21 | served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and

22 | recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. F&Rs, ECF No. 5. The magistrate

23 | judge recommends dismissing the complaint without leave to amend because the defendant, the

24 | California Victim Compensation Board, is not a “person” under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See generally

25 | id. Kyle objects to the findings and recommendations, arguing he should be permitted to amend

26 | his complaint to assert a claim against individual officers. See Objections, ECF No. 8.

27 State officials sued in their official capacity for injunctive relief are “persons” under

28 | § 1983. Will v. Michigan Dep't of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 71 (1989). State officials may also

1 | be sued in their personal capacity under § 1983. Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21, 31 (1991). The

2 | court cannot conclude on this record that Kyle’s proposed amendment would be futile, and Rule

3 | 15(a) imposes a “very liberal” policy in favor of amendment. AmerisourceBergen Corp. v.

4 | Dialysist W., Inc., 465 F.3d 946, 951 (9th Cir. 2006). The complaint is thus dismissed with

5 | leave to amend, and the findings and recommendations are adopted in part to that extent. Any

6 | amended complaint must be filed within 60 days. This matter is referred again to the assigned

7 | magistrate judge for all pretrial purposes.

8 IT IS SO ORDERED.

9 DATED: June 7, 2021.

CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

45

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.