Opinion

(PC) Quair v. Board of Parole Hearings

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Dec 10, 2020
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.5%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

10 DAVID SABINO QUAIR, III, No. 2:20-cv-0747 JAM DB

11 Plaintiff,

12 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

13 BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, et al.,

14 Defendants.

15

16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42

17 U.S.C. § 1983. By order dated September 28, 2020 plaintiff was directed to submit a completed

18 application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee within thirty days. (ECF No. 6.) He

19 was warned that failure to pay the filing fee would result in a recommendation that this action be

20 dismissed. The time to pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis

21 has passed, and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or moved to proceed in forma pauperis,

22 requested additional time to pay the fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, or

23 otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, the court will recommend that this action

24 be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders.

25 ////

26 ////

27 ////

28 ////

1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

2 | prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

4 | assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days

5 | after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

6 | with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

7 | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that

8 | failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

9 | Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

10 | Dated: December 9, 2020

11

12

B ORAH BARNES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14

15

DB:12

pp:1/orders/Prisoner/Civil Rights/quai0747 fr dism

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.