The opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 | EUGENE C. BROWN, Case No. 1:19-cv-00352-DAD-EPG (PC)
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
13 v. DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT C. PATILLO
WITH PREJUDICE
14 | C. CHOTHIA, et al.,
15 Defendants. (ECF No. 66)
16
17 Plaintiff Eugene C. Brown and Defendants C. Chothia, A. Shaw, K. Kempe, C. Jukes, M.
18 | Londono, M. Gilmore, J. Walker, M. Crutchfield, C. Patillo, K.Z. Allen, and D. Artis have
19 | filed a stipulation to dismiss all claims against Defendant C. Patillo with prejudice. (ECF No.
20 | 66.) Pursuant to the stipulation, the case against Defendant C. Patillo has ended and the case is
21 | dismissed with prejudice only as to Defendant C. Patillo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A);
22 | Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the
23 | Court is respectfully directed to terminate only Defendant C. Patillo on the docket.
24
IS SO ORDERED.
25
26] Dated: _ December 9, 2020 [sl ey
7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28