Opinion

(PC) Gabaldon v. Brown

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Dec 4, 2020
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.5%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 LINDA GABALDON, 1:20-cv-01443-DAD-GSA-PC

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE

13 vs. BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE,

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM,

14 J. BROWN, et al., FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER,

AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

15 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 1, 6.)

16 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN

FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

17

18

19

20

21 Linda Gabaldon (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

22 with this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 13, 2020, Plaintiff filed the

23 Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On October 14, 2020, the court screened the

24 Complaint and issued an order striking the Complaint for lack of Plaintiff’s signature, with leave

25 to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (ECF No. 6.) The thirty-day deadline has now

26 expired and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s

27 order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may

28 be granted.

1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:

2 1. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, this case be DISMISSED, with prejudice, based

3 on Plaintiff’s failure to obey a court order, failure to prosecute, and failure to state

4 a claim upon which relief may be granted under § 1983; and

5 2. The Clerk be directed to close this case.

6 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

7 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

8 (14) days from the date of service of these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file

9 written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to

10 Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

11 objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v.

12 Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394

13 (9th Cir. 1991)).

14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15

16 Dated: December 3, 2020 /s/ Gary S. Austin

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.