The opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 MICHAEL L. OVERTON, No. 2:20-cv-1616 KJN P
12 Plaintiff,
13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
14 BROWN,
15 Defendant.
16
17 By an order filed August 18, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to pay the required filing fees, or
18 submit a completed in forma pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his prison trust account
19 statement, and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this
20 action be dismissed. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to
21 the court’s order and has not filed the required documents.
22 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is
23 directed to assign a district judge to this case; and
24 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
28 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
wOASe COUN MEM EYP RINUINGIN IR Oe AY eT
1 | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that
2 | failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District
3 | Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (th Cir. 1991).
4 | Dated: September 29, 2020
Fens Arn
6 KENDALL J. NE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
’ /over1616.fifp
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28