Opinion

(PC) Brown v. Duffy

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Jun 1, 2020
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.4%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 LANCE BROWN, No. 2:18-cv-02494-TLN-CKD

12 Plaintiff,

13 v. ORDER

14 BRIAN DUFFY, et al.,

15 Defendants.

16

17 Lance Brown (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights

18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20 On April 17, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were

21 served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings

22 and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days.1 (ECF No. 22.) Neither party has filed

23 objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

24 ///

25 ///

26

27 1 The Findings and Recommendations indicates a 14-day period for objections in the “Plain

Language Summary” and a 30-day objection period in the conclusion. The Court has waited the

28 30-days and still no party has objected.

1 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v.

2 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

3 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

4 1983); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

5 Having reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards, the Court finds the Findings

6 and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

8 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed April 17, 2020 (ECF No. 22), are adopted in

9 full;

10 2. Defendants’ Amended Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (ECF No.

11 18) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is GRANTED to the extent it

12 requests screening of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint;

13 3. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 16) is DISMISSED without leave to

14 amend for failing to state any claim for relief; and

15 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

16 IT IS SO ORDERED.

17 DATED: May 29, 2020

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.