The opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 DEXTER BROWN, No. 2: 20-cv-0154 KJN P
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
13 v. RECOMMENDATIONS
14 K. RAM, et al.,
15 Defendants.
16
17 By an order filed January 29, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma
18 pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement, and was cautioned
19 that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. On February
20 26, 2020, the undersigned granted plaintiff an extension of time to March 15, 2020, to file his in
21 forma pauperis application.
22 Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s orders and has not filed the required documents.
23 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is
24 directed to assign a district judge to this case; and
25 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
28 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
2 UVM EIT EAINTT IN BRAUN ee OY oe
1 | objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
2 | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
3 | objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
4 | parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
5 | appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
6 | Dated: April 28, 2020
Fens Arn
8 KENDALL J. NE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
Bris4-Bifp
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28