Opinion

(PC) Brown v. Winn-Reed

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Apr 7, 2020
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.4%

mailbox rule articulated in Houston applies to civil rights actions

How later courts described this case

  • mailbox rule articulated in Houston applies to civil rights actions

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 EUGENE CARLTON BROWN, Case No. 1:19-cv-00240-LJO-BAM (PC)

12 Plaintiff, Appeal No. 20-15376

13 v. ORDER REGARDING IN FORMA PAUPERIS

STATUS ON APPEAL

14 WINN-REED, et al.,

15 Defendants.

16

17 Plaintiff Eugene Carlton Brown, (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

18 forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 24, 2020,

19 the Court dismissed this action for failure to state a claim. (ECF Nos. 15, 16.) On March 4,

20 2020, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal. (ECF No. 17.)

21 On April 6, 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals referred the matter back to this

22 Court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for

23 the appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

24 The Court finds that this appeal is not taken in bad faith and is not frivolous. Although the

25 notice of appeal was docketed on March 4, 2020, beyond the thirty days provided by Federal Rule

26 of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1)(A), the notice of appeal is signed and dated February 10, 2020.

27 (ECF No. 17.) There is no proof of service. Pursuant to the prison mailbox rule, and without the

28 benefit of other information, the Court will treat Plaintiff’s notice of appeal as filed as of February

1 10, 2020, the date it appears it was delivered to the prison authorities for mailing to the Court.

2 See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988); Douglas v. Noelle, 567 F.3d 1103, 1108–09 (9th

3 Cir. 2009) (mailbox rule articulated in Houston applies to civil rights actions). Therefore, the

4 appeal appears to be timely filed.

5 Accordingly, in forma pauperis status should not be revoked and should continue on

6 appeal.

7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8

9 Dated: April 7, 2020 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.