Opinion

Brown v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Feb 21, 2020
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.4%

The opinion

1 JOSHUA S. GOODMAN, ESQUIRE - State Bar #116576

ZACHARY S. TOLSON, ESQUIRE - State Bar #242824

2 GOODMAN NEUMAN HAMILTON LLP

417 Montgomery Street, 10th Floor

3 San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: (415) 705-0400

4 Facsimile: (415) 705-0411

Attorneys for Defendant

5 HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. (erroneously sued as THE HOME DEPOT, INC.)

***********************************************

6 MATTHEW ROSTON, ESQ. - State Bar #265944

ROSTON LAW GROUP, APC

7 9454 Wilshire Blvd., Ste 850

Beverly Hills, CA 90212

8 Telephone: (310) 550-6221

Facsimile: (310) 246-0305

9 Attorneys for Plaintiff

TIMOTHY BROWN

10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 TIMOTHY BROWN, Case No. 19-cv-00896-DAD-JLT

13 Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER

14 vs. (Doc. 19)

15 THE HOME DEPOT, INC.,

16 Defendant.

17

18 Plaintiff TIMOTHY BROWN and Defendant HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. (erroneously

19 sued as THE HOME DEPOT, INC.) do hereby submit this Stipulated Request for Dismissal

20 pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The parties have settled the matter and all terms of the

21 settlement have been agreed upon and performed. This dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims are with

22 prejudice. IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

23 DATED: February 20, 2020 GOODMAN NEUMAN HAMILTON LLP

24 By: /s/ Zachary S. Tolson

ZACHARY S. TOLSON

25 Attorneys for Defendant HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.

G No eo ud mm aa nn 26 DATED: February 20, 2020 ROSTON LAW GROUP, APC

Hamilton LLP

417 M 1o 0tn h t Fgo lom oe r ry St. 27 By: /s/ Matthew Roston

San Francisco, CA

94104 MATTHEW ROSTON

Tel.: (415) 705-0400

1 ORDER

2 The parties have settled their case and have stipulated to the action being dismissed with

3 prejudice. (Doc. 19) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations

4 effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688,

5 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

8 Dated: February 20, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

G No eo ud mm aa nn 26

Hamilton LLP

417 M 1o 0tn h t Fgo lom oe r ry St. 27

San Francisco, CA

94104

Tel.: (415) 705-0400

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.