Opinion

(PS) Brown v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Feb 11, 2020
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.4%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 SUZANNE BROWN, No. 2:19-cv-260-MCE-KJN PS

12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

13 v. AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

14 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,

(ECF. Nos. 14, 21)

15 Defendants.

16

17 On December 20, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF

18 No. 21), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

19 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On January 9, 2020,

20 plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 22), which have been

21 considered by the court.

22 This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an

23 objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore

24 Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d

25 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection

26 has been made, the court assumes its correctness and decides the matter on the applicable law.

27 See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s

28 conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d

1 | 452, 454 (th Cir. 1983).

2 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

3 | concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly,

4 | ITIS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 21) are ADOPTED IN FULL;

6 2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED;

7 3. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

8 4. Leave to Amend Plaintiff's HBOR Claim (see ECF No. 10 at pp. 6-7) is

9 WITHDRAWN;

10 5. Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 20) is DENIED AS

11 MOOT; and

12 6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

13 | IT IS SO ORDERED.

14 | Dated: February 11, 2020

16 MORRISON C. ENGLAND, J

UNITED STATES DISTRI

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.