The opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 | RAMON DANIEL VILLALOBOS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00442-DAD-EPG
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR
13 v. DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT STEPHEN
SHELLANS, JR., WITH PREJUDICE
14 | ARMENTA TIGGS-BROWN, P.A, et al.,
15 Defendants. (ECF No. 23)
16
17 Plaintiff, Ramon Daniel Villalobos, and Defendants, Armenta Tiggs-Brown and Stephen
18 | Shellans, Jr., have filed a stipulation to dismiss Defendant Stephen Shellans, Jr., M.D., with
19 | prejudice (ECF No. 23). In light of the stipulation, the case against Defendant Stephan Shellans
20 | has ended and the case is dismissed with prejudice only as to Defendant Stephan Shellans. See
91 | Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The
22 | Clerk of the Court is directed to designate the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 23) as terminated.
23
T IS SO ORDERED.
24
25| Dated: _ November 5, 2019 [see hey
6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27