Opinion

(PC) Myers v. Brown

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Oct 22, 2019
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.3%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 DALLAS JOSHUA JAMES MYERS, No. 2:18-cv-0111-MCE-EFB P

12 Plaintiff,

13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

14 EDMUND BROWN, et al.,

15 Defendants.

16

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

18 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28

19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

20 On February 12, 2019, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

21 § 1915(e)(2). The court dismissed the complaint, explained the deficiencies therein and granted

22 plaintiff thirty days in which file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies. ECF No. 8. The

23 order warned plaintiff that failure to comply would result a recommendation that this action be

24 dismissed. The time for acting has now passed and despite several lengthy extensions of time,

25 plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Thus, it appears that plaintiff is unable to cure the

26 defects in the complaint.

27 Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice

28 for the reasons set forth in the February 12, 2019 order (ECF No. 8).

1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

2 || assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days

3 | after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

4 | objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

5 || “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the

6 || objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The

7 || parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to

8 || appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez

9 | v. Vist, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

10 | Dated: October 21, 2019.

ll tid. HDeMA

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

12 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.