Opinion

(PS) Barroga v. Board of Administration, Cal PERS

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Oct 1, 2019
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.3%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 LUCIO A. BARROGA, No. 2:19-cv-921-MCE-KJN PS

12 Plaintiff, ORDER

13 v. (ECF No. 29)

14 BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION,

CAL.PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’

15 RETIREMENT SYSTEM,

16 Defendant.

17

18 On September 9, 2019 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No.

19 29), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

20 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On September 23,

21 2019, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 31), which have

22 been considered by the court.

23 This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an

24 objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore

25 Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d

26 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection

27 has been made, the court assumes its correctness and decides the matter on the applicable law.

28 See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s

1 || conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d

2 || 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

3 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

4 | concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly,

5 | ITIS HEREBY ORDERED that:

6 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 29) are ADOPTED in full;

7 2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED;

8 3. Defendant’s Motion to Declare Plaintiff Vexatious (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED in part

9 and DENIED in part;

10 4. Plaintiff is hereby DECLARED a vexatious litigant; and

11 5. The Court ISSUES a pre-filing order as described in Section II.D. of the Magistrate

12 Judge’s findings and recommendations; and

13 6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

14 IT IS SO ORDERED.

15 | Dated: September 30, 2019

16 fi CK,

I 3 NGLANG. IR )

" UNITED STATES DISTRICT TOS0e

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.