Opinion

(PC) Harris v. Brown

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Aug 21, 2019
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.3%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 DARREN HARRIS, No. 2:19-cv-1406 KJN P

12 Plaintiff,

13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 JERRY BROWN, et al.,

15 Defendants.

16

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel.1 Plaintiff’s complaint was filed

18 with the court on July 24, 2019. The court’s own records reveal that on May 16, 2019, plaintiff

19 filed a complaint containing virtually identical allegations. (Harris v. Jerry Brown, No. 2:19-cv-

20 0311 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal.).2 Due to the duplicative nature of the present action, the court will

21 recommend that the complaint be dismissed.

22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign

23 a district judge to this case; and

24 ////

25 1 Plaintiff added the names of other inmates to the caption of his complaint, but none of the other

inmates signed the pleading. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. Also, plaintiff proceeds pro se and may not file

26

claims on behalf of other individuals. Thus, this action proceeds solely as to plaintiff Harris.

27

2 A court may take judicial notice of court records. See MGIC Indem. Co. v. Weisman, 803 F.2d

28 500, 505 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119 (9th Cir. 1980).

1 IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ.

2 | P.41b).

3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the District Judge assigned to this

4 | case pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served

5 | with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court.

6 | The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

7 | Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time

8 || may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th

9 | Cir. 1991).

10 | Dated: August 21, 2019

Arse A Abar

12 KENDALL J. NE

Jharr1 406.23 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.