The opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2515
DOROTHY F. GODWIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CURTIS A. BROWN, Detective, Christiansburg
Police Department; K. E. ALBERT, Sergeant,
Christiansburg Police Department; CHRISTIANS-
BURG POLICE DEPARTMENT; IRIS B. TUCKER, Magis-
trate, Christiansburg, Virginia,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-98-178)
Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 15, 2000
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dorothy F. Godwin, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Wayne Austin, JOHNSON,
SCYPHERS & AUSTIN, P.C., Abingdon, Virginia; Linwood Theodore
Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Dorothy F. Godwin appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on her 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint and
denying her motion filed under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s memorandum opinion and orders and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Godwin v. Brown, No. CA-98-178 (W.D. Va. June 22 & Oct. 12, 1999).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con-
tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2