Opinion

Harrison v. Faughn

Court
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Filed
Jul 6, 2022
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.1%

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

CENTRAL DIVISION

DANA HARRISON, et al. PLAINTIFFS

V. NO. 3:18-CV-00214-ERE1

BRODIE FAUGHN, et al. DEFENDANTS

ORDER

The Court has received the mandate of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

filed on July 1, 2022 (Doc. 126), which requires that the Court dismiss, with

prejudice: (1) Plaintiffs James O’Hara’s and Christa Hess’s individual-capacity

claims against Defendant Brodie Faughn; and (1) Each Plaintiff’s individual-

capacity claim against Defendants Robert Stacy and Jeff Sanders. 2

In addition, after considering the Eighth Circuit’s opinion (Doc. 124) and

carefully reviewing the record, the case arguably might be narrowed further.3 See

Thompson v. C.I.R., 821 F.3d 1008, 1011 (8th Cir. 2016) (explaining that “when a

1 The parties previously consented in writing to the jurisdiction of a United States

Magistrate Judge. Doc. 39. On May 28, 2021, following Magistrate Judge Beth Deere’s retirement,

this case was reassigned to the undersigned.

2 For example, each Plaintiff brings individual capacity claims against Wynne City

Council members, alleging that they failed to investigate the same record of complaints provided

to Defendants Stacy and Sanders. Doc. 26 at 13. These individual-capacity claims are possibly

impacted by the Eighth Circuit’s opinion and conclusion that Defendants Stacy and Sanders are

entitled to qualified immunity.

case has been decided by an appellate court and remanded for further proceedings,

every question decided by the appellate court, whether expressly or by necessary

implication, is finally settled and determined, and the court on remand is bound by

the decree and must carry it into execution according to the mandate). However,

before making that determination, the Court would like to hear from the parties.

Simultaneously with this Order, the Court enters a Final Scheduling Order

setting this case for a jury trial on September 12, 2022 and establishing other pretrial

deadlines.4 The Court directs the parties, in filing their Joint Status Report, which is

due by July 20, 2022, to: (1) identify the parties that remain in the case; (2) state

what claims remain for trial; (3) indicate their best estimate for how long the trial

should last; and (4) address any other matters bearing upon the efficient and fair

resolution of this case. The parties should indicate whether they agree on these

issues. As to any disagreement, they should each explain their respective position

and, if appropriate, provide any supporting legal authority.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that pursuant to the Eighth Circuit’s mandate

(Doc. 126) summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of: (1) Defendants Brodie

Faughn, as to claims against him in his individual capacity by Plaintiffs James

O’Hara and Christa Hess; and (2) Defendants Robert Stacy and Jeff Sanders, as to

4 Due to the age of this case, time is of the essence in scheduling this matter for trial.

However, if the parties are unavailable that week, they should promptly notify the Court in writing,

no later than five (5) days from this Order.

all claims against them in their individual capacities. These individual capacity

claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are directed to file, by July 20,

2022, a joint status report as described in this Order.

DATED this 6th day of July, 2022.

if TED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.