# 29 CFR § 1607.9: No assumption of validity

> Federal · Regulations · In force

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/ecfr-29-1607.9

## Section

- **Citation:** 29 CFR § 1607.9
- **Heading:** No assumption of validity
- **Jurisdiction:** Federal
- **Kind:** Regulations
- **Status:** In force
- **Text as of:** September 22, 2026
- **Source:** Publisher's official text
- **Location:** Title 29—Labor > Subtitle B—Regulations Relating to Labor > CHAPTER XIV—EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION > PART 1607—UNIFORM GUIDELINES ON EMPLOYEE SELECTION PROCEDURES (1978) > General Principles

## Text

A. Unacceptable substitutes for evidence of validity. Under no circumstances will the general reputation of a test or other selection procedures, its author or its publisher, or casual reports of its validity be accepted in lieu of evidence of validity. Specifically ruled out are: assumptions of validity based on a procedure's name or descriptive labels; all forms of promotional literature; data bearing on the frequency of a procedure's usage; testimonial statements and credentials of sellers, users, or consultants; and other nonempirical or anecdotal accounts of selection practices or selection outcomes.
B. Encouragement of professional supervision. Professional supervision of selection activities is encouraged but is not a substitute for documented evidence of validity. The enforcement agencies will take into account the fact that a thorough job analysis was conducted and that careful development and use of a selection procedure in accordance with professional standards enhance the probability that the selection procedure is valid for the job.

## Nearby sections

- [29 CFR § 1607.1 § 1607.1 Statement of purpose.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/ecfr-29-1607.1.md)
- [29 CFR § 1607.2 § 1607.2 Scope.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/ecfr-29-1607.2.md)
- [29 CFR § 1607.3 § 1607.3 Discrimination defined: Relationship between use of selection procedures and discrimination.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/ecfr-29-1607.3.md)
- [29 CFR § 1607.4 § 1607.4 Information on impact.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/ecfr-29-1607.4.md)
- [29 CFR § 1607.5 § 1607.5 General standards for validity studies.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/ecfr-29-1607.5.md)
- [29 CFR § 1607.6 § 1607.6 Use of selection procedures which have not been validated.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/ecfr-29-1607.6.md)
- [29 CFR § 1607.7 § 1607.7 Use of other validity studies.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/ecfr-29-1607.7.md)
- [29 CFR § 1607.8 § 1607.8 Cooperative studies.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/ecfr-29-1607.8.md)
- [29 CFR § 1607.9 § 1607.9 No assumption of validity.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/ecfr-29-1607.9.md)
- [29 CFR § 1607.10 § 1607.10 Employment agencies and employment services.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/ecfr-29-1607.10.md)
- [29 CFR § 1607.11 § 1607.11 Disparate treatment.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/ecfr-29-1607.11.md)
- [29 CFR § 1607.12 § 1607.12 Retesting of applicants.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/ecfr-29-1607.12.md)
- [29 CFR § 1607.13 § 1607.13 Affirmative action.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/ecfr-29-1607.13.md)
- [29 CFR § 1607.14 § 1607.14 Technical standards for validity studies.](https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/ecfr-29-1607.14.md)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/statutes/ecfr-29-1607.9. Check the current official text before relying on it. Not legal advice.